Sourav Ganguly
Sourav Ganguly. (Photograph by SAM PANTHAKY/AFP through Getty Photographs)

The organizers of Legends League Cricket (LLC) introduced {that a} particular match can be performed to have a good time the seventy fifth anniversary of India’s Independence Day on September 16, a day earlier than the beginning of the competitors. Sourav Ganguly, who is ready to look within the recreation, won’t be charging any cash for the match, confirmed the CEO of the league, Raman Raheja.

The match will likely be performed between India Maharajas and World Giants at Eden Gardens, and Ganguly will lead India Maharajas. World Giants, then again, will likely be led by the 2019 World Cup-winning captain, Eoin Morgan. 

Ganguly had initially informed on document that he wouldn’t take part within the LLC. However just a few days later, he confirmed that he can be a part of the league. This drew criticism from followers, alleging that it was cash that influenced the BCCI president’s resolution. “No, Sourav Ganguly shouldn’t be charging something for this match,” stated CEO of LLC, Raman Raheja as quoted by My Khel.”

We’d not prefer to name it a charity match: Raman Raheja

“It is a particular match devoted to the seventy fifth yr of Independence. We’re engaged on some particular points that will be supported by the league. We’d not prefer to name it a charity match,” added Raheja. A bunch known as ‘Energetic Discussion board for Justice’ raised some questions over the involvement of the previous India captain within the league in an e-mail addressed to BCCI secretary Jay Shah.

The e-mail learn, “BCCI is a belief and Mr. Sourav Ganguly is the President in an ‘workplace of no revenue’. How is then Ganguly charging cash to play in Legends League Cricket T20 (LLC T20) whose founder and MD Raman Raheja is blacklisted by ICC for earlier monetary irregularities in 2019.” In addition they questioned Ganguly’s resolution to play within the league and his affiliation with Raheja. The CEO of LLC, nonetheless, refused to reply to the allegations that had been made in opposition to him.